Scribes
saurabh is a manic- depressive graduate student with delusions of
overturning well- established social hierarchies through sheer weight of cynicism. in his spare time he writes self-effacing auto- biographical blurbs.
dan makes things up casually, effortlessly, and often. Never believe a
word he says.
hedgehog burrows between San Francisco and other areas rich in roots and nuts. His father says he is a literalist and his mother says he is very smart. Neither of them say aloud that he should spend less time with blegs and more time out of doors.
Pollocrisy
Blegs
- scrofulous
- wax banks
- a tiny revolution
- under the same sun
- alt hippo
- isthatlegal?
- informed comment
- abu aardvark
- crooked timber
- bob harris
- saheli: the gathering
- john & belle have a blog
- red state son
- pharyngula
- critical montages
- living the scientific life
- pass the roti
- attitude adjustor
- pandagon
- this modern world
- orcinus
- a lovely promise
- ufo breakfast
- sabdariffa
- to do: 1. get hobby, 2. floss
Links
Archives
- 11.2003
- 04.2004
- 05.2004
- 06.2004
- 07.2004
- 08.2004
- 09.2004
- 10.2004
- 11.2004
- 12.2004
- 01.2005
- 02.2005
- 03.2005
- 04.2005
- 05.2005
- 06.2005
- 07.2005
- 08.2005
- 09.2005
- 10.2005
- 11.2005
- 12.2005
- 01.2006
- 02.2006
- 03.2006
- 04.2006
- 05.2006
- 06.2006
- 07.2006
- 08.2006
- 09.2006
- 10.2006
- 11.2006
- 12.2006
- 01.2007
- 02.2007
Search
Site Feed
11 April, 2006
Entropy
The fate of all things. This was once Highway 1, the main paved road down the coast of California. Today it is quiet enough to hear the tiny waterfall from 50 meters, songbirds, the wind rustling flight feathers of hovering hawks. A mile below, the current highway is closed by a landslide, so the land is almost empty of humans from the ocean across to Interstate 280, a very rugged few miles away. It is encouraging, in the middle of the disaster-prone Bay Area, to visit a place where one can see that chaos and destruction of human endeavors is not, in the long term, the end of the world.
Comments
i said that but what i meant to say was that in the absence of sanity in board rooms and legislatures, american dependence on automobiles continues to increase .
Posted by hibiscus
Posted by hibiscus
so there's a remote possibility that slack in the housing market is what holds gasoline prices in check. big oil: "you'll pay what i want you to pay!" rich person: "no! i'll move where i can drive less!" big oil: "that worked before, but now... you can't afford to move except further into my clutches! bwaa ha ha."
Posted by hibiscus
Posted by hibiscus
Seems unlikely. Housing markets aren't that (insert economics term here). People can't uproot and move in order to find cheaper prices willy-nilly. SOME people might be able to, but those people are also likely not to give a shit about gas prices. Also if what you're saying were true, demand for gas would have to be decreasing rather than going up, which seems to be the general trend (although admittedly there's no data for the past four years in that graph).
Posted by saurabh
Posted by saurabh
you didn't like my little melodrama. i'm greatly saddened.
if i put together what we both wrote then it comes out something like this. with the housing market so completely batty, the annual price difference between this mortgage and that mortgage is much greater than the difference between the fuel and maintenance costs, even at $x.xx/gal. is it so much larger that it's money-cheaper to drive 3 hours a day than to live near job and walk? seems like it. if you want to own a house.
that graph isn't corrected for population growth. per capita would be more useful. don't know what to say about this except that i wouldn't expect demand to decrease for the above reasons.
flexibility in the housing market isn't really about an individual wanting to move. it's about how the millions of people who move house every year choose their next residence. job markets are less stable. that probably means people are keeping housing options open more than they used to.
(i don't know how i feel about high or low gas prices. if high prices are not discouraging driving, and they don't seem to be, then i am against high prices as we have them now, where much of the additional price is going to expansion and almost none does anything good.)
also, i keep seeing quotes like "don't get me wrong, i love my car" and "i love driving but" when people are asked questions about money-price or nature-price of driving - with such a strong emotional component i wonder if we haven't "enabled" something. maybe it's dishonest to say that japan or europe or wherever is doing better environmentally than the united states, when they're making so much money here. we seem to be the world's dumping ground for the externalities of big ticket products. externalities of product usage.
Posted by hibiscus
if i put together what we both wrote then it comes out something like this. with the housing market so completely batty, the annual price difference between this mortgage and that mortgage is much greater than the difference between the fuel and maintenance costs, even at $x.xx/gal. is it so much larger that it's money-cheaper to drive 3 hours a day than to live near job and walk? seems like it. if you want to own a house.
that graph isn't corrected for population growth. per capita would be more useful. don't know what to say about this except that i wouldn't expect demand to decrease for the above reasons.
flexibility in the housing market isn't really about an individual wanting to move. it's about how the millions of people who move house every year choose their next residence. job markets are less stable. that probably means people are keeping housing options open more than they used to.
(i don't know how i feel about high or low gas prices. if high prices are not discouraging driving, and they don't seem to be, then i am against high prices as we have them now, where much of the additional price is going to expansion and almost none does anything good.)
also, i keep seeing quotes like "don't get me wrong, i love my car" and "i love driving but" when people are asked questions about money-price or nature-price of driving - with such a strong emotional component i wonder if we haven't "enabled" something. maybe it's dishonest to say that japan or europe or wherever is doing better environmentally than the united states, when they're making so much money here. we seem to be the world's dumping ground for the externalities of big ticket products. externalities of product usage.
Posted by hibiscus